Ghost vs WordPress: publishing, SEO, memberships, and who each suits

Ghost's own comparison page sums up its position in two sentences: "Ghost is better for publishing and blogging. WordPress is better for building a dynamic, complex website." That is a vendor talking, but as a starting point it is fair; the details below decide which side your site is on.

What Ghost is built for

Ghost is a publishing tool first. Its comparison page lists "registration forms, member management, payments, subscriptions and email newsletters" as built in, features a WordPress site adds with plugins or outside services. Paid subscriptions run through your own Stripe account, and Ghost(Pro), the managed hosting run by the Ghost team, takes no transaction fee on top: its pricing page lists 0% transaction fees, with the payment processor's fees still applying.

The search basics are built in as well. Ghost(Pro)'s plan comparison lists "meta tags, structured data, XML sitemaps, and canonical URLs" as standard, with no plugin to configure.

The content model is deliberately small: posts, pages, tags and authors. There are no categories; when you migrate from WordPress, Ghost converts categories to tags and makes each post's first category its primary tag. There is also no plugin system in the WordPress sense. Ghost's integrations page calls an integration "the Ghost equivalent of a plugin", found in its directory and connected through embeds, webhooks or the API rather than installed from an app store.

What WordPress does that Ghost does not

WordPress is built to run almost any site, from a blog to a shop or a directory. Custom post types and custom taxonomies let it model content Ghost has no place for, and its plugin directory covers most features a site can need, from ecommerce to forms to SEO.

The cost of that breadth is assembly. Memberships, paid subscriptions and newsletters each need a plugin or an external service, and the SEO basics usually come from an SEO plugin; our post on the best plugins for WordPress SEO covers which ones a blog needs. More parts mean more updates and more places for settings to collide.

Ghost vs WordPress compared

	Ghost	WordPress
Built for	Publishing, memberships and newsletters	Any kind of site
Memberships and paid subscriptions	Built in; 0% Ghost(Pro) transaction fee on plans that include them	Plugins or external services
Email newsletters	Built in, unlimited sends on Ghost(Pro)	Plugins or an email service
SEO basics	Built in: meta tags, structured data, sitemaps, canonicals	Core plus an SEO plugin
Content types	Posts and pages	Posts, pages and custom post types
Taxonomy	Tags, with one primary tag per post	Categories, tags and custom taxonomies
Extending	Integrations through embeds, webhooks and the API; themes	Plugins, themes, custom code
API	Read-only Content API for published content	REST API in core
Managed hosting (October 2026)	Ghost(Pro) from $18 a month billed yearly for up to 1,000 members	Many hosts, or WordPress.com
Blog at example.com/blog	On Ghost(Pro), the Business plan plus a $50 a month add-on and your own reverse proxy	A proxy or the same install, on any host

Ghost(Pro) prices rise with your member count. Its Starter plan, at $18 a month billed yearly, has one built-in theme and no paid subscriptions; custom themes and paid subscriptions start on Publisher at $29, and Business costs $199. Self-hosting Ghost is the alternative; as the pricing page puts it, "if you self-host then you're the one who loses sleep."

SEO: built in versus added on

Ghost's advantage is that a new site gets the technical basics right without anyone configuring them. WordPress gets to the same place with an SEO plugin, and then lets you go further: custom taxonomies for hub pages, schema per content type, redirect managers, programmatic templates.

Neither platform decides rankings. Those come from the blog layer, what you publish and how it fits together, which the blog SEO page breaks down, and from internal linking that ties related posts to each other. Two Ghost-specific points matter there. A tags-only taxonomy works well for most blogs but gives you fewer tools for a large, structured archive. And putting a Ghost(Pro) blog in a folder of your main domain costs a Business plan and an add-on, so on the cheaper plans the blog lives on the root domain or a subdomain.

Moving from WordPress to Ghost

Ghost Admin includes a WordPress migrator. You export your WordPress content as an XML file and upload it; the docs list XML files up to 100 MB and up to 2,500 posts as supported. Custom post types, most uncommon shortcodes and plugins that alter access to content are not. Categories become tags, and Ghost's docs warn that you "may need to add redirects to ensure backlinks lead to the correct content." Larger or more complex moves go through Ghost(Pro)'s migrations team or Ghost's open-source migration tools.

For search, the redirects are the part to get right: map every old URL, including category and date archives, to its new address before you switch, and keep post slugs wherever you can.

The headless angle

Both platforms can run headless, with a separate front end rendering the content. Ghost's Content API "delivers published content to the world" read-only, covering posts, pages, tags, authors, tiers and settings, through a key that only exposes public data. WordPress does the same through its REST API, which is how headless WordPress works.

Going headless moves the SEO work to the front end on either platform: a custom front end has to produce the meta tags, sitemaps and structured data that Ghost's own site output provides, as the headless CMS SEO page lays out.

Who each one suits

Ghost suits independent writers and publishers who want a site, a newsletter and paid memberships in one product, with few moving parts.

WordPress suits businesses whose blog is one part of a larger site, sites that need custom content types, a shop or many integrations, and teams that want tools to publish into the CMS automatically.

How Structura handles this

Structura is not integrated with Ghost. It does not create Ghost posts or send Ghost newsletters. It publishes in two ways: into WordPress through its plugin, as native posts, or into a headless space whose posts any front end fetches from the Content API.

Getting Structura's posts into a Ghost site is possible only with custom work. A headless space can send each newly published article, with its HTML, Markdown and meta fields, as a signed request to an HTTPS endpoint you run; a developer could have that endpoint create the post through Ghost's Admin API. Alternatively, a custom front end could render Structura's posts on its blog routes and Ghost's content elsewhere. You would build and maintain either one, and only new publications trigger the request, so edits need their own sync.

For a search blog that runs on a schedule, WordPress or your own front end on the Content API are the supported paths; the API-first CMS page shows what the API returns.

FAQ